The court directed the District Magistrate to expedite the disposal of the matter referred to by the petitioners. The writ petition was disposed of with a specific clarification that no observations were made on the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
EARNEST ANIL KUMAR WASHINGTON & ANR.
..... Petitioners
Through: Ms. Kamlesh Jain, Advocate.
versus
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Malik, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Vishal Chanda, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 12.03.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 12, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/03/2024 at 12:50:10
Earnest Anil Kumar Washington
Office of the District Magistrate
Government of NCT
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
