Disposed

Vinod v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC19 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/768/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Street vendor sought a direction for a survey by the Town Vending Committee and issuance of a certificate of vending, plus protection from being displaced from his site at Sarojini Nagar Market. Respondents stated a survey would be held under the 2019 Scheme allowing all claimants to submit evidence; court disposed of the petition without ordering site protection.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vinod Vs Government of NCT Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 768/2024 CM APPL. 3365/2024 VINOD

¶4

..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajinder Kumar, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ORS.

¶5

	..... Res	pondent
Through:	Mr.Divyam Nandrajog,	Panel
	Counsel and Mr.Mayank	Kamra,
	Advocate for R1 and R4.
	Ms.Mehak Nakra, ASC for	NDMC
	Ms.Disha Choudhary	and
	Mr.Abhishek Khari, Advoc	ates for
	R2 and R3.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R

¶7

% 19.01.2024 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, inter alia , praying that respondent no. 3 (Town Vending Committee) be directed to conduct the survey of the petitioner in a time bound manner and issue a certificate of vending in favour of the petitioner.

¶8

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that a survey will be held shortly and in terms of paragraph 1.1.12 of the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019, all persons claiming to be street vendors would be provided an opportunity to submit evidence in support of their claim that they are/were engaged in street vending. He submits that this would be irrespective of whether a street vendor has been found at the given site.

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:14:24

¶10

In view of the above statement, the petitioner’s grievance regarding holding of the survey as well as regarding issuance of certificate of vending, is addressed.

¶11

The petitioner also prays that he may not be disturbed from carrying on his trade from the site, that is, in front of Shop No.120, Opposite Babu Market, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi.

¶12

The learned counsel for the respondents states that there are large numbers of street vendors who are claiming that they are/were carrying on their trade in Sarojini Nagar Market. However, the said market cannot sustain the number of persons who have approached this Court. The learned counsel submits that the actual survey will determine whether the petitioner can be permitted to carry on his trade at the aforesaid site in the Sarojini Nagar Market.

¶13

In view of the above, we do not consider it apposite to pass any orders to the said effect.

¶14

The petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶15

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶16

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶17

JANUARY 19, 2024 M

¶18

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:14:24

Vinod v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vinod v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Dr. Rohini Pakhiddey

Subhojit Chatterjee Vs Union of India and Ors..

Shri Venkateshwar Constructions-Vdb Projectes (P) Ltd. (Jv) Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt of India

Ms Shivansh Associates Vs Ms Roop Raj Banquet Restro Bar and Ors.

Chandra Shekhar Vs the State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Maj B S Maan Vs Union of India and Others

Sunil Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs Ms Veeena Gaba

Mehboob Ahmad Vs the Registrar of Trademarks & Anr.

Pankaj Dayal Vs Amanpreet Singh Kohli

Arihant Engineering Industries & Ors. Vs Leo Infracapital Ltd. & Anr.

Ranjana Bhasin Vs Surender Singh Sethi & Ors.

Dbs Bank India Limited Vs Religare Finvest Limited

Avdesh Kumar Sharma Vs Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.