The petitioner challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Finding the petition covered by a prior batch order, the High Court dismissed the writ petition while clarifying that the petitioner could raise permissible pleas before the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
versus
DR. PRANAV KAPOOR & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ankur Chhiber, Advocate for R- 1.
Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Government Counsel with Mr. Jitender Tripathi, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
W.P.(C) 765/2024 and CM APPL. 3361/2024 -Stay .
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:20:23
respondents does not dispute this position.
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
JANUARY 19, 2024/ib
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:20:23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
DR. PRANAV KAPOOR
ANR.
REKHA PALLI
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
