The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner-in-person and disposed of a connected stay application without consideration due to its non-survival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
DR. SARITA SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Petitioner 2 in person
versus
DR. TAYYABA TANVIR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advs. for University of Delhi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 18.01.2024
W.P.(C) 7639/2023
1. Petitioner 2 appears in person and seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
2. This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
CM APPL. 37360/2023 (stay)
3. This application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 18, 2024 rb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:18:27
Dr. Sarita Sharma
Dr. Tayyaba Tanvir
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
