Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars; the court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition and pending application as withdrawn.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
M/S GANPATI TRAVELS THROUGH ITS PROP. VINOD KUMAR PRASAD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Ms. Sheenu Priya, Mr. Atik Gill, Mr. Sudhir Kumar Shukla, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JULY 4, 2024/r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 00:04:57
Pushp Raj
M/S Ganpati Travels through its Prop. Vinod Kumar Prasad
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
