Petitioner withdrew a writ petition after arguments, seeking liberty to pursue remedies for enhanced compensation in accordance with law. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.
Liberty granted to pursue remedies for enhanced compensation; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. JAI SINGH RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P. Rana, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advs. for LAC. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. Shubham Kumar, Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh & Mr. Naved Ahmed, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms. Sangeeta Bharti & Ms. Vidushi Gupta, Advs. for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 09.07.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
JULY 09, 2024 ‘gsr’ Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 15:18:58
Sh. Jai Singh Rana
Union of India & Ors.
Vibhu Bakhru
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
