Disposed

Ms. Ajit Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Delhi HC20 May 2024W.P.(C)/7243/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought recall of an earlier order binding MCD to take action on alleged misuse of the subject property, claiming the photographs concerned a different property and that no hearing was given. The court declined to recall the order but directed MCD to hear the applicant and petitioner in person before any further action.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ms. Ajit Kaur Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi… — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~100

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 7243/2024, CM APPL. 35129/2024,

¶4

MS. AJIT KAUR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rohit Yadav, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Sapra, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Urvashi, Adv for R-2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 12.08.2024

¶12

CM APPL. 35130/2024 & CM APPL. 35131/2024

¶13

The applicant while taking this Court to paragraph no.5 of the order dated 20.05.2024, contends that the same is misconstrued by the respondentCorporation and the respondent-Corporation is likely to take action against the applicant without even realising that the photographs in question were placed by the applicant in the instant writ petition relates to some different property.

¶14

The relevant paragraph No. 5 of the order reads as:-

¶15

“5.The learned counsel for the Respondent No.1/MCD, on instructions, submits that the action that is proposed to be taken by the Respondent no.1/MCD qua the misuse of the subject property, shall be taken within

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:23:00

¶17

a period of six weeks. The Respondents are bound down to the said statement.”

¶18

The applicant further submits that he was not given any opportunity of being heard when order dated 20.05.2024 came to be passed.

¶19

I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant and in view of the nature of directions which came to be passed in the order dated 20.05.2024, the Court is not inclined to recall the same as the Court has only directed the respondent-Corporation to take action in accordance with law.

¶20

The respondent-Corporation, however, is directed to afford an opportunity of being heard in person to the applicant in the instant application as well as to the petitioner of the instant writ petition before taking any further action.

¶21

If the parties are aggrieved by any of the actions taken by the respondent-Corporation, they shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, the instant applications stand disposed of.

¶23

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶24

AUGUST 12, 2024/KG

¶25

Ms. Ajit Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ms. Ajit Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Sh. Mahesh Kapoor Vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation & Ors.

Nbcc (India) Ltd. Vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council / District Magistrate (West), Government of NCT of

Smt. Somarani and Anr. Vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Chharia Impex Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6-1, Delhi & Anr.

Sharpi Agarwal Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 34(1), Delhi & Ors.

Naresh Mittal Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 43(6) Delhi & Ors.

Shalimar Fincap Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 23 1 New Delhi & Anr.

Surender Singh Banga & Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through the Commissioner & Ors.

Rahul Arora Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ishwar Singh Dhankar Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Dr. R B Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Ayaan International Foundation Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Sh Rakesh Kumar Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Ors.