The petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition after arriving at a settlement with the respondents, evidenced by a Memorandum of Understanding regarding a property dispute. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
SURENDER SINGH BANGA & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ramesh K. Keswani and Mr. Pranav Singal, Advs. with Mr. Gunjot Singh Bunga, petitioner in person
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Standing Counsel-MCD
Mr. Pradeep Mishra and Mr.Ashish Upadhayay, Advs. for Respondent 4 Mr. Rajesh Chauhan, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 16.05.2024
“Shri Rajesh Chauhan son of Shri Om Prakash Resident of 11/81, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi-27, (hereinafter called the First Party)
AND
Smt. Navneet Kaur W/o Shri Gunjot Singh R/o V-295, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-27 (hereinafter called the Second Party)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:40:37
XXXXX
_And whereas the first party has sold the Second Floor with roof/terrace rights, out of Free Hold built up Property Bearing No.V-295, area measuring 200 Sq.Yards, situated in the approved residential colony known as Rajouri Garden, in the area of village Tatarpur, New Delhi27, along with proportionate undivided, indivisible & imparting ownership rights in the underneath land, to the second party, as per agreement dated __/05/2024.
And whereas it is mutual settled between both the parties that both the parties have filed the Suit Filed against the each other in respect of the above mentioned property, and hearing dates are 14/05/2024 and 16/05/2024 and before that both the parties, have compromise and assure to each other, that before the finalization of deal both the parties shall withdrawn the Suit File Case from High Court and Lower Court and it is also agreed that the first party shall not raise construction on Second Floor and Third Floor of the said property.”
SACHIN DATTA, J
MAY 16, 2024/ kr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:40:37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to withdraw the writ petition following a settlement?
SURENDER SINGH BANGA & ANR.
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER & ORS.
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
