Petitioner sought writ relief apparently connected to proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. After arguments, counsel withdrew the petition seeking liberty to approach the DRT for early hearing. The court permitted withdrawal, disposed of the petition and pending application, and left all rights and contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
NEHA GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Davesh Bhatia with Mr. Sadre Alam, Advocates
versus
RISALO DEVI & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 20.05.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 20, 2024/ msh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:07:31
Neha Gupta
Risalo Devi
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
