The petitioners' grievance no longer survives. The court disposed of the writ petition and pending applications as infructuous. The application for impleadment by an intervenor was allowed, permitting them to proceed according to law without prejudice to their rights.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V. P. Rana and Mr. Nikhil Beniwal, Advocates.
versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Shekher Kaushik, Ms. Pooja Jain and Ms. Rashmi Kullu, Advocates for Applicant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 10.01.2024
CM APPL. 681/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:20:02
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 10, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:20:02
SH. JUGAL KISHORE & ORS.
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ANR.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
