The petitioner challenged a writ petition regarding debarment from prequalified bidders and forfeiture of bid security. The court found the debarment period had lapsed and disposed of the petition clarifying future eligibility.
The writ petition was disposed of; it was clarified that the petitioner is eligible for future tenders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S RAJKUMAR DHAKANE .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akshay Sapre, Mr. Abhijeet Swaroop, Ms. Shivani Karmakar, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Mr. Manu Bajaj, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
06.09.2024
1 “Impugned order”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:16:57
the pre-qualified list of bidders for a period of three months.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 6, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:16:57
M/S RAJKUMAR DHAKANE
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
