The High Court of Delhi disposed of a petition by W.P.(C) 6836/2024 simultaneously with CM applications, relying on a prior order in W.P.(C) 4273/2024, at the request of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
AIMLAY PRIVATE LIMITED (THROUGH THE DIRECTOR SH. RAKESH GUPTA) & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms Beenashaw Soni, Mr Jitin Singhal and Ms Mansi Jain, Advocates.
versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (DELHI WEST) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Anurag Ojha, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Subham Kumar and Mr Kumar Abhishek, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 20.08.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
AUGUST 20, 2024 RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:30:52
Aimlay Private Limited
Commissioner of Central Tax (Delhi West)
Vibhu Bakhu
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
