The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with the consent of both parties. Concurrently, the connected contempt application was closed.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected CM application closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
CESC LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr Devank Maheshwari, Adv.
versus
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION .....Respondent Through: Mr Siddharth Vasudev, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 16.08.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 16, 2024 /ds
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2024 at 12:34:14
CESC LIMITED
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
