Allowed

Dr.Sanjay Mohan Marale v. University of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC10 May 2024W.P.(C)/6754/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 152 CPC was filed to correct a typographical error in an order dated 10.05.2024 which erroneously recorded the date of a representation as 07.02.2024 instead of the actual date, 01.10.2023. The court allowed the correction to issue a corrigendum. No specific legal principle was discussed as the note was innocuous.

What did the court decide?

Mandatory corrections to the order dated 10.05.2024 to replace the incorrect date 07.02.2024 with 01.10.2023 in paragraphs 6 and 8, and to issue a corrigendum.

Dr.Sanjay Mohan Marale Vs University of Delhi and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 6754/2024

¶4

DR.SANJAY MOHAN MARALE ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Brajesh Singh, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal and Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates Mr. Apoorv Kurup and Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, Advocates for R-3/UGC.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 31.05.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)

¶12

CM APPL. 34248/2024

¶13

This is an application under Section 152 CPC, 1908 filed on behalf of the applicant/petitioner seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 10.05.2024.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner submits that the representation originally was sent by e-mail by the applicant/petitioner to the non-applicants/respondents on 01.10.2023. It was only the reiteration of the same e-mail which was sent by the applicant/petitioner on 07.02.2024. He submits that it appears that this Court had inadvertently noted the date of 07.02.2024 in place of 01.10.2023.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2024 at 11:49:35

¶18

Notice accepted by Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, learned counsel for the respondent-University and by Mr. Apoorv Kurup, learned counsel for respondent no.3.

¶19

Mr. Rupal has no objection in case the present application is allowed, being innocuous.

¶20

This Court has also noted that the original representation sent by e- mail was on 01.10.2023 and it was only reiterated and re-sent on 07.02.2024.

¶21

In that view of the matter, necessary corrections may be carried out in respect of the date, i.e., 07.02.2024, which may be replaced with 01.10.2023 in paragraphs 6 and 8 of order dated 10.05.2024. After rectification, the said paragraphs would read as under:-

¶22

“ 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation dated 01.10.2023 was submitted by the petitioner to the Vice-Chancellor which may be directed to be disposed of in accordance with law.

¶23

8. In view of the above, keeping the aforesaid and the right of the respondent reserved, the Competent Authority/ViceChancellor may dispose of the representation dated 01.10.2023 sent by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today. ”

¶24

The corrected copy be issued by way of a corrigendum and be uploaded on the official website.

¶25

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶27

MAY 31, 2024 Aj

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/06/2024 at 11:49:35

Dr.Sanjay Mohan Marale v. University of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Sanjay Mohan Marale v. University of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjiv Kumar Vashist Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Ors.

Trio Security and Intelligence Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sh. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

National Federaion of Farmers Procurement Processing & Retailing Cooperativs of India Ltd. Nacop Vs Union of India & Ors. & Anr.

Lord Krishna Tradexim LLP (Pan AABCL4428K) (as Successor in Interest of Lord Krishna Tradexim (P) L Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1) Delhi & Ors.

Chandershehar Malhotra Vs North Delhi Power Ltd.

Naresh Mittal Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 43(6) Delhi & Ors.

Neelkanth Steel and Alloys Vs Asstt. Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Circle 49(1), & Ors.

Maa Jhandewali Co-Operative Urban Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. Vs the Registrar Co-Operative Societies, & Ors.

Self-Financing Educational Indtitutions Association Vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors.

Self-Financing Educational Institutions Association Vs Directorate of Higher Education and Anr.

Self-Financing Educational Institutions Association Vs Directorate of Higher Education and Anr.

Aman Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dr Dalvinder Singh Vs Jamia Millia Islamia University and Ors.

Sathy B Kumar Vs Kerala Education Society Senior Secondary School through Chairman and Ors.