The High Court of Delhi granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition pursuant to an application made, consequently dismissing the petition as withdrawn, while leaving all rights and contentions open.
Leave withdrawn; petition dismissed as withdrawn. Rights and contentions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
RAJAN DAS GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Monalisa Maity, Adv.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Awadesh Kumar Sindh, SPC with Mr.Amit Acharya, GP for R-1. Mr.Om Prakash SPC for UOI with Mr.Nitish Pande, Adv for R-2/UGC. Mr.Amitesh Kumar and Ms.Priti Kumari, Advs for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 04.10.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
OCTOBER 4, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:46:39
Rajan Das Gupta
Union of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
