An order dismissing a writ petition in default due to non-appearance of the petitioner despite service of a notice and lack of prosecution on the last hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
SHEELA .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
DECEMBER 23, 2024 g.joshi
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 12:21:01
Sheela
Delhi Cantonment Board
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
