Mamchand v. the Estate Officer & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A Default Order dismissing Writ Petition (C) 6449/2021 by the Delhi High Court for non-prosecution after service of notice on the petitioner despite no appearance.
A Default Order dismissing Writ Petition (C) 6449/2021 by the Delhi High Court for non-prosecution after service of notice on the petitioner despite no appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MAMCHAND .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Mishra, Advocate CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 23.12.2024
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
DECEMBER 23, 2024 g.joshi
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/12/2024 at 12:21:08
Mamchand
Delhi Cantonment Board
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court