The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and associated applications. The High Court of Delhi granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~112
MS. RENU DUA AND OTHERS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Mr.Prateek Gupta, Mr.Umang Chopra, Ms.Medha Sarin, Mr.Daljeet Dabas and Mr.Vishal Maan, Advocates
versus
KARAN SINGH ..... Respondent
Through: Nemo
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 03.05.2024
After some length of arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition alongwith the pending applications.
Leave granted.
The petition alongwith pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MAY 3, 2024 dy/av
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:21:17
MS. RENU DUA
KARAN SINGH
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
