The respondent sought withdrawal of a complaint filed before the State Commission and foregone benefits. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition as having become infructuous.
The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
versus
EX SEP SHIV KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Ms. Astha Sharma and Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 09.02.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 9, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:43:59
MANAGING DIRECTOR, ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION & ORS.
EX SEP SHIV KUMAR
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
