The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition seeking information under the RTI Act as infructuous. The respondent counsel stated that the information had already been provided in criminal proceedings, rendering the petition unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. R.P. Daida, Mr. Anant Gautam, Ms. Shivani Sagar, Mr. Dinesh Sharma and Ms. Anani Achumi, Advocates.
versus
ASEEM KUMAR SINGLA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Jain, Mr. Sahil A. Garg Narwana and Mr. Anubhav Singla, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 09.02.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:38
CPIO ALLAHABAD BANK
ASEEM KUMAR SINGLA
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
