The petitioner filed an application seeking recall of an order dated 03.05.2024. The Court characterized the application as a review petition and held that the grounds raised did not fall within the limited ambit of review jurisdiction, noting an impermissible attempt to re-argue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, SPC, Mr. Chetan Jadon, GP, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Adv.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 31.05.2024
CM APPL. 34138/2024 –Recall by Petr.
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MAY 31, 2024/ al
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2024 at 12:38:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for recall of an earlier order is maintainable as a review petition on the grounds raised?
ANNEPU RADHAKRISHANAN
UNION OF INDIA
ANR
REKHA PALLI
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
