Disposed

Gajendra Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC16 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/616/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction to the Town Vending Committee to conduct the petitioner's survey and issue a certificate of vending, and protection from eviction from his site at Sarojini Nagar Market. Respondents undertook a survey under paragraph 1.1.12 of the 2019 Scheme; the Court declined to pass orders on the site and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Gajendra Kumar Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~38

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 616/2024 GAJENDRA KUMAR

¶4

..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajinder Kumar, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶5

..... Respondents Through: Mr.Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel and Mr.Jatin Dua, Advocate for R1 and R4. Mr.Akshay Verma, ASC for NDMC.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 16.01.2024 CM APPL. 2722/2024

¶7

Exemption is allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶8

The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 616/2024 CM APPL. 2721/2024

¶9

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, inter alia, praying that respondent no. 3 (Town Vending Committee) be directed to conduct the survey of the petitioner in a time bound manner and issue a certificate of vending in favour of the petitioner.

¶10

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that a survey will be held shortly and in terms of paragraph 1.1.12 of the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019, all persons claiming to be street vendors would be provided an opportunity to submit evidence in support of their claim that they are/were engaged in street vending. He submits that this would be

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:18:47

¶12

irrespective of whether a street vendor has been found at the given site.

¶13

In view of the above statement, the petitioner’s grievance regarding holding of the survey as well as regarding issuance of certificate of vending, is addressed.

¶14

The petitioner also prays that he may not be disturbed from carrying on his trade from the site that is near Shop No.39, adjacent to school wall, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi.

¶15

The learned counsel for the respondents states that there are large numbers of street vendors who are claiming that they are/were carrying on their trade in Sarojini Nagar Market. However, the said market cannot sustain the number of persons who have approached this Court. The learned counsel submits that the actual survey will determine whether the petitioner can be permitted to carry on his trade at the aforesaid site in the Sarojini Nagar Market.

¶16

In view of the above, we do not consider it apposite to pass any orders to the said effect.

¶17

The petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶18

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶19

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

¶20

JANUARY 16, 2024 M

¶21

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶22

Gajendra Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Gajendra Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuvansh Prasad Singh Vs the Government Ofn.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

Am Mining India Private Limited Vs Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors.

M/S Steel Authority of India Limited (Sail) Vs Union of India & Anr.

Jk Tyre and Industries Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Dr. Rohini Pakhiddey

Subhojit Chatterjee Vs Union of India and Ors..

Shri Venkateshwar Constructions-Vdb Projectes (P) Ltd. (Jv) Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt of India

Ms Shivansh Associates Vs Ms Roop Raj Banquet Restro Bar and Ors.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 18 Vs M/S Wig Investment

Union of India & Ors. Vs Chandra Kant Sharma & Ors.

Managing Committee Bluebells School International Vs Rajesh Mathews & Ors.

M/S Sunlight Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Yonex Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Ram Archa Kumar and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Shailendra Pathak Vs Union of India & Ors.