Disposed

Mohammad Samjad and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/566/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerning street vendors under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 was disposed of. Upon the petitioners' satisfaction with the respondents' statement that following Certificate conditions prevents removal, the court allowed exemption subject to exceptions.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions; application disposed of.

Mohammad Samjad and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 566/2024

¶4

MOHAMMAD SAMJAD AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashaswi S. K. Chocksey and Mr. Ankit Singh, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shweta Priya, Adv for MCD. Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Aamir Shoaib, Advs for R-2/ SHO.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% CM APPL. 2537/2024

¶10

15.01.2024

¶11

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application is disposed of.

¶13

W.P.(C) 566/2024 & CM APPL. 2536/2024

¶14

Petitioners have filed present petition, inter alia praying as under:-

¶15

“a.) Allow the present petition and issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ of similar nature, directing the Respondents to allow the petitioners as mentioned in the memo of parties to peacefully vend in terms of the Certificate of Vending issued by Respondent No. 1; and/or;

¶16

b.) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ of similar nature, directing the Respondents to follow due procedure as enumerated in the Street Vendors Act, 2014 and Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:37:21

¶18

Vending) Scheme, 2019 while, as and when, seizing the goods of the petitioners and allocation of space; and/ or;”

¶19

The petitioners state that they have been vending from the designated site i.e. Yusuf Sarai Market, Hauz Khas, New Delhi and although they have been protected under Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, they are being harassed and removed from their site by the respondents.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that if the petitioners follow the conditions as stipulated in the Certificate of Vending, they shall not be removed/prevented from carrying on their activity of street vending.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is satisfied with the aforesaid statement made by the respondents.

¶22

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶23

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶24

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶25

JANUARY 15, 2024 aks

¶26

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:37:21

Mohammad Samjad and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Samjad and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Singh Vs Government of NCT O Delhi & Ors.F

Mahendra Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Roop Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Punjab National Bank Vs Seven Seas Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Qudsiya Vs Cbse & Anr.

Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Airports Authority of India

Chandra Sen Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shiv Pujan Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sandeep Singh Vs Government of NCT O Delhi & Ors.F

Mahendra Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Roop Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ranjana Gupta & Ors. Vs Burger King Corporation

Vandana Yadav & Anr. Vs Deepa

Saroj Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.