Chhaya Chanchal v. Aditi Mahavidyalaya & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdraws petition; order dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi and Mr. Arquam Ali, Advs.
versus
ADITI MAHAVIDYALAYA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Devansh Malhotra, Advs. for R-2.
Ms. Renu Gupta, Ms. Cariua Arora and Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, Advs. for R- 3/ NCTE. Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press the present petition any further, the same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
AUGUST 20, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:40
Chhaya Chanchal
Aditi Mahavidyalaya
Rekha Palli
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court