High Court of Delhi treated a writ petition as a representation. Court directed Secretary, Dept of Training and Technical Education, GNCTD to decide by speaking order expeditiously without commenting on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9.
N. C. GOEL AND ANR. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Praveen Swarup, Adv.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish ahlawat, Standing Counsel, Gnctd (services) with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. Mr. B.S. Rawat Mr. Apoorv Kurup, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Mittal and Ms. Gauri Goburdhan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 05.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:57:25
to treat the present writ petition as a representation and to decide the same by way of a speaking order in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open. This Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 5, 2024 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:57:25
N. C. Goel
Govert of NCT of Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
