The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court. The Court granted permission to withdraw.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~91
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Kadamabini Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel, Ms. Neha Sharma, G.P. with Ms. Karnika Bahuguna, Advocate for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 10.04.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
APRIL 10, 2024/ ms
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:44:50
DR. SANDEEP JAISWAL
UNION OF INDIA
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
