Application seeking modification of an earlier order in a writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn; directions issued earlier regarding service remain.
Application dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
Through: Mr. Nitin Joshi, Mr. Vaibhav Thaledi, Mr. Shivam Rawt, Mr. Keshav Kant Sharma and Mr. Harsimran Singh, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
CM APPL. 25412/2024
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
At 01:20 pm
CM APPL. 25412/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:20:27
applicant/petitioner mentions the matter and on instructions from the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present application.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
MAY 1, 2024 Aj/ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:20:28
Rajesh Kumar Yadav
Union of India & Ors
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
