Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise grievances elsewhere. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty granted.
Permission to withdraw with liberty granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Mr. Vijay Kumar Dwivedi and Mr. Santosh Kukmar, Advocates
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) AND OTHERS
..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate for DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 08.04.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
APRIL 8, 2024/ ns
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:46:44
Sunder Pal
The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Others
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
