Discretion was exercised to allow exemption under CM applications. The main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Exemption allowed; main petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Hanuman Singh, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. Lakshay Gunawat and Mr. Krishnan V., Advs. for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
CM APPLs. 20698/2024 & 20699/2024 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5050/2024, CM APPL. 20697/2024
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition and connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
APRIL 8, 2024 /aky
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:07:37
SUBHASH KUMAR BAUDDHA AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
