Writ petition concerning a railway electrification contract dispute was withdrawn by the petitioner without prejudice to ongoing arbitration proceedings.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to rights and contentions in arbitration proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
CIPL COBRA JV THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. JAVIER GOMEZ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Kaushik, Advocates.
versus
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Ms. Usha Jamnal and Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
%
O R D E R 20.12.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner has entered appearance pursuant to the order dated 03.12.2024. He seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in arbitration proceedings.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 20, 2024 SS/AL/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:34
CIPL Cobra JV through its authorized signatory Mr. Javier Gomez
Executive Director Railway Electrification
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
