Rahul Sharma v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Page 1 of 2 $~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 17581/2024
RAHUL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhojraj, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghavendra Pratap Singh, Advocate for MCD/R-2 & 3. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Gaind, SPC for R-4 & 5. [M:-9810262633]. Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate for R-6 & 7/DDA-STF. Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Ms. Nisha Dhawan & Mr. Naman Kumar Thakur, Advocates for R-8.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
%
O R D E R 20.12.2024
- The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking a direction upon the respondents to demolish a structure being raised at property No. 429, Ward No. II, Kucha Brij Nath, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006 [“subject property”].
- The petitioner had earlier approached the Court for the same relief in W.P.(C) 15394/2024 [ Rahul Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. ] but was permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Special Task Force [“STF”], constituted by the Supreme Court vide
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rahul Sharma
- respondent
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Coram
Prateek Jalan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court