Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a petition in view of an out-of-court settlement between parties. High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn based on the settlement agreement.
Petition along with pending Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
RACHNA GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Advocate through VC. versus
TEJBIR SINGH & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Katara & Mr. Soin Khan, Advocate for R-1. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 through VC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 08.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:55:03
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
NOVEMBER 8, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:55:03
Rachna Gupta
Tejbir Singh
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
