Petitioner challenged an attachment warrant against her pension. Court disposed of the writ by directing the respondent to decide the recall application within a week, leaving contentions open.
Direction to decide petitioner's recall application for the attachment warrant within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Burman, Advocate.
versus
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR GRADE (I) & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Udit Malik, ASC with Mr.Prashant Manchanda, Ms.Nancy Jain and Ms.Haridas Medna Dilip, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 11.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:06:11
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 11, 2024 KA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 13:06:11
Kusmita Mishra
Assistant Collector Grade (I)
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
