Madan Pal Tyagi v. the Chief Administrative Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear, including on the previous date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
MADAN PAL TYAGI .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kamalkant Jha, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JULY 9, 2024/pa
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:58:08
Madan Pal Tyagi
The Chief Administrative Officer
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court