Writ petition challenging suspension of the petitioner's Twitter account; since respondent restored the account, petitioner sought withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
JASDEEP MUNJAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Ms. Lohitaksha Shukla and Mr. Kunal Tiwari, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, GP for UOI. Ms. Shloka Narayanan and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for X Corp/R-2.
CORAM:
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:35:28
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 N/ABK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:35:28
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jasdeep Munjal
Union of India
X Corp
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
