Writ petition dismissed in default for want of prosecution as petitioner was absent when the case was called for hearing. Pending application also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
SUNIL C. KURIAN & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
versus INDIAN COUNCIL FOR CHILD WELFARE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan with Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Harshit Goel, Mr. K. V. Vibu Prasad and Mr. Sujay Jain, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Pritha Sri Kumar and Mr. Arun Sri Kumar, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subrodeep Saha and Mr. Kushal, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Karan Gaur, Advocate for CAG. Mr. Prasanta Varma, SPP with Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Ms. Pragya Verma and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Palo, Advocates for R-8.
INDIAN COUNCIL FOR CHILD WELFARE
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
% 07.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:40:36
respondent no. 1 stated that the petitioner no. 1 had already been expired and no steps have been taken by the surviving legal heirs of the petitioner no. 1 for their substitution.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 sk/ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:40:36
Sunil C. Kurian & Ors
Indian Council for Child Welfare & Ors
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
