The High Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed after clarifying that the findings of the Special Enquiry Team will not be used against the petitioner in the proposed departmental enquiry, a position already clarified by the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 12.03.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/03/2024 at 11:37:34
were to clarify that the findings of the SET will not be used against the petitioner in the departmental enquiry proposed to be held against him.
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
MARCH 12, 2024/ p
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/03/2024 at 11:37:34
2 issues framed by the court
Can preliminary enquiry findings be used in subsequent departmental proceedings?
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of based on the clarification sought by the petitioner?
SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE
UNION OF INDIA
REKHA PALLI
SHALINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
