Dismissed

Shaifali Singh Rathore v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC4 Mar 2024W.P.(C)/3228/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Chamber dismissed W.P.(C) 3228/2024 as withdrawn with liberty to file before the Central Administrative Tribunal, where jurisdiction was contested due to the Quality Council of India's notification under Section 14(3) of the Administrative Tribunals Act. No merits were discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.

Shaifali Singh Rathore Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~93

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3228/2024

¶4

SHAIFALI SINGH RATHORE ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Nishant Mandal and Mr. Raman Raj Gangwar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP and Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Vikas Chopra and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates for R-3.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 04.03.2024 CM APPL. 13281/2024 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

W.P.(C) 3228/2024 & CM APPL. 13280/2024

¶13

Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the Quality Council of India has been notified under Section 14(3) of the Administrative Tribunals Act and, therefore, since the petition raises service dispute, the Central Administrative Tribunal is the appropriate forum.

¶14

Confronted with this, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:52:54

¶16

Permission and liberty, as prayed for, is granted.

¶17

It is made clear that the preliminary objection was raised by the Respondent before the learned Counsel for Petitioner commenced his arguments and therefore this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case.

¶18

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.

¶19

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶20

MARCH 4, 2024 hsk

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:52:54

Shaifali Singh Rathore v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaifali Singh Rathore v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tau Devi Lal Memorial College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education

R S Memorial College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education

Dr Sonali Badhe Vs Union of India and Ors.

Safety Matters Foundation & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vijendra Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ojaswi Bundela Vs Union of India & Ors.

Deepak Marwah, Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Mohan Lal Gaba Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes Income Tax Department

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Anr. Vs Bureau of Immigration

Arpit Gupta & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Central Public Information Officer Vs Kailash Chandra Moondra

Nettel Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Police & Anr.

Avnish Kumar Tyagi Vs Cpio, O/O the Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Sundresh Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.