The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the Petitioners, who sought disclosure of pending Look Out Circulars against them. The Court accepted notice and, upon the Respondent's statement of fact regarding existing LOCs and the limitation of prayers, disposed of the petition without further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
Through: Mr. Chetan Pathak, Adv. with Ms. Arham Tanuir, Mr. Dhairya BM. Verenkar, Mr. Uday Arora, Mr. Sanket Vashishta and Mr. Akhil Kumar, Advs.
versus
BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Kaushal Jeet Kait, Adv.
CORAM:
is taken up for final hearing and disposal, at this stage itself.
W.P.(C) 3122/2024
page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:24:36
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MARCH 1, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
W.P.(C) 3122/2024 page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/03/2024 at 11:24:36
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary
Anr.
Bureau of Immigration
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
