The High Court of Delhi dismissed an application seeking impleadment of telecom service providers and the Department of Telecommunication, noting the parent writ petition was disposed of earlier with no further orders needed.
The applications for impleadment were dismissed with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~106.
JAYANT MOON ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sankalp Todi, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar (Senior Panel Counsel); Ms. Shefali Munde, Adv. Mr. Mansoor Ali Shoket, Mr. Nitin Kala and Mr. Kunal Singh, Advs. for R-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 13.05.2024
CM APPL. 28179/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:56:28
services across India. He contends that without their presence the order dated 16th February, 2024 cannot be given effect to.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MAY 13, 2024 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:56:28
Jayant Moon
Union of India
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
