The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner upon condonation of delay application. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~91
versus
THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-4&5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 08.07.2024
CM APPL. 37572/2024 (condonation of delay)
W.P.(C) 3073/2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 08, 2024/p
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:58:45
KRISHAN KUMAR CHAPRANA @BINTOO
THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
