Dismissed
Ranu Sen v. Chinmoyee Sen & Anr.
Delhi HCRFA/961/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An order dismissing a revision appeal for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence despite multiple calls for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~9
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 961/2016 , C.M. 9533/2015 & Crl.M.A 15480/2016 RANU SEN .....Appellant
¶4
- Through: None.
¶5
- versus
¶6
- CHINMOYEE SEN & ANR .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.
¶7
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R
¶8
- % 08.07.2024
¶9
- None appears for the appellant despite the matter being called out in the second round.
¶10
- None had appeared after 02.03.2023.
¶11
- Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶12
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ranu Sen
- respondent
Chinmoyee Sen & Anr
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court