Petitioner sought to withdraw his writ petition challenging action by the IBBI Disciplinary Committee; counsel stated on instructions that the petition would be withdrawn, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
MANISH GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Milan Singh Negi, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Jha, Advocates
versus
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr. Kartikey Bhargave, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 12.12.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:12:20
Manish Gupta
Disciplinary Committee Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
