Dismissed

Namrata Gupta @ Namrata Amar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC11 Dec 2024W.P.(C)/16273/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking enforcement of Dubai court orders for maintenance, passport name changes, and tracing the ex-husband, directing the petitioner to regular civil proceedings under CPC.

What did the court decide?

All prayers for tracing the respondent, passport modifications, and enforcement of foreign maintenance orders were dismissed.

Namrata Gupta @ Namrata Amar Vs State Govt of NCT of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16273/2024 & CM APPLs. 68492/2024, 68493/2024

¶4

NAMRATA GUPTA @ NAMRATA AMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Diwakar Singh, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Mr. Hussain Adil Taqvi, G.P., Ms. Usha Jamnal and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates for UOI.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R % 11.12.2024

¶10

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayers:

¶11

“a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to trace the ex- husband of the Petitioner, herein Respondent No. 4, and direct the concerned authorities to produce him before this Hon’ble Court, so that he may be held accountable for evading the payment of maintenance and child support as ordered by the Dubai courts;

¶12

b. Issue a writ or direction to the Regional Passport Officer, Delhi to process the application for change of the Petitioner’s name from NAMRATA GUPTA to NAMRATA AMAR and to change the address in her passport accordingly;

¶13

c. Issue a writ or direction to the Regional Passport Officer. Delhi for the necessary change in the name of the baby daughter from AMARA YAMEER GUPTA to AMARA AMAR in the passport;

¶14

d. Issue a writ or direction to the Regional Passport Officer. Delhi for the necessary change in the address in the passport of the minor daughter Amara from House no. 2356, Sector 35 / C, Chandigarh

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:00:09

¶16

160036, Chandigarh, India to Khansaheb residency, 17b Street, Dubai, UAE , whose legal custody rests with the Petitioner;

¶17

e. Direct Respondent No. 4 to pay all arrears of maintenance and child support as ordered by the Dubai courts and the amount for which he was being served a notice for be Saudi court within a stipulated time, failing which appropriate legal action should be initiated against him;

¶18

f. For interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) hereinabove;

¶19

g. Any other and further reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may be granted;”

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner asserts that the Petitioner has a judgment delivered by the Dubai Court, and asserts that under the notification issued by the Ministry of Law and Justice dated 17^th January, 2020, in exercise of powers conferred by Explanation 1 to Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,¹ the Central Government has declared United Arab Emirates to be a reciprocating territory for the purposes of the said section and accordingly, the orders passed by Dubai Courts are executable under the CPC. In light of the above, in case the Petitioner desires to execute the judgment passed by the Dubai Court, the Petitioner is free to take recourse to appropriate procedure under the CPC. The writ is therefore, not the correct remedy.

¶21

As regards the Petitioner’s first prayer for issuance of directions to trace Respondent No. 4, is concerned, it must be noted that Respondent No.4 is not an accused in any FIR/complaint. Further, the Petitioner can file a missing person complaint before the appropriate police station and the police authorities can take appropriate action on the Petitioner’s request.

¶22

1 “CPC”

¶23

¶24

In so far as the Petitioner’s prayer (b) and (c) are concerned, the Petitioner can approach the Regional Passport Office for carrying out the necessary change of names in the passports issued to her and her daughter. Prayer (d) is not being pressed by the Petitioner.

¶25

With respect to prayer (e), the Petitioner has to take recourse to appropriate proceedings under the matrimonial and maintenance laws for claiming maintenance and child support. If the directions already issued by Dubai Court to this effect have to be executed, as observed above, the Petitioner can take recourse to the procedure provided under the CPC.

¶26

In light of the above, none of the reliefs sought in the present petition can be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court is therefore, not inclined to entertain the present petition.

¶27

Dismissed along with pending applications.

¶28

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶29

DECEMBER 11, 2024 as

¶30

Namrata Gupta @ Namrata Amar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Namrata Gupta @ Namrata Amar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ex Rect Bhuw Aneshw Ar Sah Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh Jiwachh Prasad Roy Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Mohit International through, Prop. Harsh Anil Kumar Vasant Vs Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Complex (Exports) & Ors.

Echo International and Ors. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs Import and Anr.

Brahampal Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

S a N Garments Manufacturing Private Limited Vs Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 7 and Anr. & Anr.

Rashmi Kumari Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dharampal and Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Henna Alagh Vs Union of India and Anr.

Manjeet Singh Bal Vs Tree Officer and Deputy Conservator of Forests

Rajeev Kumar Vs 1. Central Information Commission (Cic) through Cpio & Ors.

Mahalaxmi Malt Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Peqtor Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Rashmi Kumari Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.