Stay application in a writ petition was withdrawn by counsel with liberty to pursue review or appeal; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Hemant Kumar Yadav, SPC with Mr. Kapil Dev Yadav, Advocates for UoI. Ms. Richa Dhawan, Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Harshita Maheshwari, Advocates for DDA.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 22.10.2024 CM APPL. 62156/2024 ( for stay )
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to take remedies in review or appeal, as the petitioner may be advised.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
OCTOBER 22, 2024 “Bhupi”/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:44:39
Shuchi Goyal
Municipal Corporation Delhi
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
