Disposed

Pandav Nagar Residents Welfare Association Regd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC20 Feb 2024W.P.(C)/2396/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions to shift or alter the timing of the weekly market in Pandav Nagar due to resident difficulties. The Court treated the petition as a representation and directed the Municipal Commissioner to decide by reasoned order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed by directing MCD Commissioner to treat it as a representation and decide by reasoned order within four weeks.

Pandav Nagar Residents Welfare Association Regd Vs… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~32

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2396/2024

¶4

PANDAV NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REGD ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms.Monica Kapoor, Advocate with petitioner in person.

¶6

Versus

¶7

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr.Jai Wadhwa, Advocate.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶10

O R D E R % 20.02.2024

¶11

Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to either shift the Wednesday weekly market being conducted in Pandav Nagar or to conduct the weekly market on Monday when the local market is closed or to conduct the same in an enclosed ground of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (‘MCD’) named as “Dhobhi Ghat” in Pandav Nagar.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the weekly market is being conducted in Pandav Nagar on Wednesday of every week since last so many years due to which the residents face great difficulty in commuting. She states that the Wednesday weekly bazaar is being conducted in Pandav

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/02/2024 at 12:49:56

¶14

Nagar contrary to the directions of the Supreme Court passed in W.P. (C) 1699/1987 vide order dated 06^th February, 2007. She states that the said shops are set up in contravention of the scheme framed for squatters/hawkers by MCD vide Resolution no.377 dated 25^th October, 2004 and approved by the National Policy on Street Vendor, 2004. She states that the SOP framed by the MCD is not being followed by the hawkers.

¶15

She further states that the petitioner-association has been requesting the hawkers to set up their shops/sites on one side of the road only to avoid hindrance in the movement of the residents but the shopkeepers have turned a deaf ear to the repeated requests of the petitioners. She also states that the directions issued by MCD vide decision dated 07^th October, 2020 finalizing the schedule for running of weekly bazaars are not being followed by the squatters/hawkers.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner-association has sent several representations dated 26^th July, 2022, 29^th May, 2023, 01^st June, 2023, 13^th June, 2023 and 15^th January, 2024 informing the respondent no.2 about the hardships being faced by the residents due to the said weekly bazaar. She states that, however, no response has been received. She contends that though only hundred vendors have been granted permission to participate in the Wednesday market in Pandav Nagar and that too in the area of 4’x6’, yet at least 500 vendors come and sell their goods in said market and they occupy at least 10’x10’ choking the entire area.

¶17

Learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, states that the proposal to shift the weekly market from Wednesday to Monday is under consideration of senior officials of MCD.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/02/2024 at 12:49:56

¶20

Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court disposes of the writ petition by directing the Commissioner, MCD to treat the present writ petition as a representation and decide the same by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within four weeks.

¶21

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶22

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 20, 2024 KA

¶24

Pandav Nagar Residents Welfare Association Regd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandav Nagar Residents Welfare Association Regd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Shanna @ Shandilya Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Satinder Pal Singh Vs the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Mohd. Nomaan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (through Commissioner) & Ors.

Saleem Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Khushi Pratap Singh Vs Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.

Sh. Sumeet Sharma Vs the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

M/S Indochem and Polymers Vs Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 207 Zone 11

Chaman Lal Bhambri Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) and Anr.

Sunil Grover & Anr. Vs Sushil Kumar Chadha

Inder Pratap Singh Akoi (through His Duly Constituted Attorney) Vs Shri Hari Mohan Sharma & Ors.

Pratap Singh Rathi and Anr. Vs Suresh Kumari and Ors.

Akash Bharti Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs the Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors.

Union Bank of India Vs Hulas Rahul Gupta

Waqf Welfare Forum Vs New Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors.