Allowed

Uttam Kumar Mondal v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/2393/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's claim to the Old Pension Scheme under CSS (Pension) Rules, 1972. Relying on the respondents' stand and the Ministry OM dated 03.03.2023 covering employees appointed against posts notified before 01.01.2004, the High Court held the petitioner entitled to the Old Pension Scheme.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be covered under Old Pension Scheme from date of retirement; benefits to be worked out and released within twelve weeks with adjustments of amounts already released.

Uttam Kumar Mondal Vs Union of India & Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2393/2019, CM APPL. 54783/2019 -Dismissal of Writ. & CM APPL. 13920/2020 -Disposal by Petr. UTTAM KUMAR MONDAL ..... Petitioner Through: None.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R- 1 & 2.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 15.01.2024

¶7

The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 17.12.2018 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 1253/2017. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has rejected the claim of the petitioner for being considered under the CSS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (commonly known as the Old Pension Scheme) by upholding the respondent’s decision to apply the National Pension System (commonly known as the New Pension Scheme) to the petitioner.

¶8

Even though none appears for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents submits that taking into account that the post of Junior Technical Officer-II (Instrument) against which the petitioner was appointed on 15.06.2005 was notified in September 1999 i.e., well

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:51:52

¶10

before 01.01.2004, the date when the new pension scheme came into force, the petition is entitled to succeed. He submits that not only is this issue covered in favour of the petitioner by a number of decisions of this Court but even the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions has, on 03.03.2023, issued an OM directing that the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme be extended to all those central government employees, who had been appointed against posts which were advertised or notified before 01.01.2004.

¶11

He further submits that in accordance with the OM issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, a decision to extend the benefits of the Old Pension Scheme to the petitioner had already been taken. He, however, submits that the actual benefits accruing to the petitioner under the Old Pension Scheme are yet to be calculated and released to petitioner.

¶12

In the light of this fair stand taken by the respondents, and having perused the OM dated 03.03.2023, para 4 whereof reads as under, we are of the considered view that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of the Old Pension Scheme.

¶13

“4. The matter has been examined in consultation with the Department of Financial Services, Department of Personnel & Training, Department of Expenditure and Department of Legal Affairs in the light of the various representations/references and decisions of the Courts in this regard. It has now been decided that, in all cases where the Central Government civil employee has been appointed against a post or vacancy which was advertised/notified for recruitment/appointment, prior to the date of notification for National Pension System i.e.

¶14

¶15

22.12.2003 and is covered under the National Pension System on joining service on or after 01.01.2004, may be given a one-time option to be covered under the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021). This option may be exercised by the concerned Government servants latest by 31.08.2023.”

¶16

For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is allowed by setting aside the impugned order dated 17.12.2018 and directing that the petitioner would be entitled to be covered under the Old Pension Scheme from the date of his retirement. The actual benefits payable to the petitioner will be worked out and released, within twelve weeks, after making necessary adjustments of the amount, if any, already released to him.

¶17

The writ petition, alongwith all pending applications, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶18

REKHA PALLI, J

¶19

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶20

JANUARY 15, 2024 al

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:51:52

Uttam Kumar Mondal v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uttam Kumar Mondal v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Singh Vs Government of NCT O Delhi & Ors.F

Mahendra Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Roop Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Punjab National Bank Vs Seven Seas Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Qudsiya Vs Cbse & Anr.

Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Airports Authority of India

Chandra Sen Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shiv Pujan Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shri Anil Kumar Singh Biswas Vs Union of India & Ors.

Union of India and Anr. Vs Vijay Pal Singh

Union of India and Anr. Vs Suneel Kumar

Union of India & Anr. Vs Sushil Kohli

G.M. Sampath Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vijayan T.G. Vs Union of India & Anr.