Ms. Bittoo v. Northern Railways and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No appearance of the petitioner resulted in the dismissal of the writ petition and all pending applications for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
MS. BITTOO .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
NORTHERN RAILWAYS AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash, SPC for UOI, with Mr. Nitish Pande, Ms. Swati Mishra, Mr. Sarthak Udaipuria, Adv. Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Mr. Harshita Maheshwari, Advs for DUSIB.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 20.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 20, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2024 at 11:19:06
Ms. Bittoo
Northern Railways
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court