K.G. Mishra v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition abated as the petitioner expired during pendency and legal representatives were not brought on record within the permitted time under Order XXII CPC.
Writ petition abated as the petitioner expired during pendency and legal representatives were not brought on record within the permitted time under Order XXII CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
Through: Mr Piyush Sharma and Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advocates
versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar and Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 19.11.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024/ shivam
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:29:50
K.G. Mishra
Punjab National Bank
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court