Petitioners, successful candidates in a DSEU recruitment whose appointments were cancelled citing a DoPT OM, sought appointment letters. The court directed that the petition be treated as a representation and decided by DSEU's competent authority within two weeks after hearing a petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
% Judgment delivered on: 13.02.2024
EKTA MAHAR & ORS ..... Petitioner
versus
DELHI SKILL AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP UNIVERSITY & ORS ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Ms. Daisy Hannah, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Bikram Dwivedi, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel with Ms. Surbhi Soni, Advocates for R- 2.
Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, SPC with Mr. JHilal Haider, GP for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
JUDGMENT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]
“ a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby setting aside the impugned Notice No.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:1 5.02.2024 17:06:53
W.P.(C) 2044/2024
Page 1 of 3
F.No.12(136)/DSEU/HR/2023/601 dated 03.01.2024 issued the Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University (DSEU) and consequently, appoint the petitioners to their respective posts with all consequential benefits thereof, including seniority, backwages, continuity of services etc;
b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the Respondent No.1 not to start afresh recruitment process;… ”
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:1 5.02.2024 17:06:53
W.P.(C) 2044/2024
Page 2 of 3
been deprived of such valuable fundamental right, except in accordance with law.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.
FEBRUARY 13, 2024 Aj
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:1 5.02.2024 17:06:53
W.P.(C) 2044/2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be treated as a representation to be decided by DSEU's competent authority.
Ekta Mahar & Ors
Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University & Ors
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
